Is Heavier Weight Better For Muscle Growth?
I’ve had a flood of clients lately asking the same question: “Should I be lifting heavier weights for lower reps—like to absolute failure—if I want to put on muscle?”
My guess? They saw some guy on TikTok screaming about “maximal stimulus” while his veins bulged and spittle was flying. So let’s cut out the BS and give you the information you actually need—the kind grounded in real research, not influencer mythology.
Here’s how you build muscle intelligently: with methods that work, that protect your joints, that allow you to train consistently, and that make you stronger week after week.
Hypertrophy Happens Across a Wide Rep Range
The research is clear: muscle growth occurs anywhere from 5–30 reps, as long as you take the set close enough to failure (Schoenfeld et al., 2017). Studies consistently show that when effort is matched, both heavy (≤5 reps) and lighter (20–30 reps) loads stimulate similar hypertrophy because the muscle fibers reach high fatigue regardless of the weight (Morton et al., 2016).
The real drivers of muscle growth are:
Mechanical tension
Total weekly volume
Proximity to failure
This is why evidence supports 8–20 sets per muscle group per week as the sweet spot for hypertrophy (Schoenfeld, 2010; Schoenfeld et al., 2019).
Should You Train Heavy? Yes—but strategically.
Heavy loads (3–6 reps) absolutely have their place. They’re great for:
Building strength
Improving neurological efficiency
Adding confidence under the bar
But they also come with a higher cost:
Increased joint stress, elevated systemic fatigue, and slower recovery (Fry, 2004).
Can you grow using heavy weights? Yes.
Do you need to train heavy all the time to grow? Not at all.
Most hypertrophy stimulus comes from moderate loads that allow you to accumulate volume without breaking your body down.
Why Constant Failure Training Is a Terrible Idea
Let’s be clear: failure has its place. It recruits the hardest-to-reach muscle fibers and can boost hypertrophy when used intelligently (Schoenfeld & Grgic, 2019).
But going to failure every set is a fast track to:
Nervous system burnout
Joint irritation
Technique breakdown
Lower weekly training volume
Slower recovery
And here’s something the internet never mentions:
Failure Under Heavy Loads should be Mostly for Competitors—Not Regular Lifters
If you’re failing under a heavy barbell, there should be a reason.
And that reason is almost always competition—powerlifting, Olympic weightlifting, strongman—sports where max-effort singles actually matter for performance.
For the average guy who wants muscle, strength, longevity, and mitigation of injury?
Yes, you can take heavy sets to failure…
But you’re not gaining anything meaningful from it beyond the fact you “did it” which, I admit, can be a fair goal… Sometimes.
From a muscle growth perspective and a strength perspective, going to absolute failure on heavy compound lifts produces no additional benefit compared to stopping 1–3 reps shy of failure—yet it dramatically increases fatigue and injury risk.
It’s simple:
Back squat or Deadlift to failure frequently? Bad idea.
Bicep curls or triceps pressdowns to failure? Pretty safe, very useful.
Save heavy failure work for the sports that require it. Taking your sets to within a couple of reps of failure is going to be almost as beneficial without the downsides from the stress created during full-maximal work.
Your best results come by training smart, not reckless.
The Intelligent Muscle-Building Framework
If your goal is hypertrophy, the research (and real-world evidence) points to this:
Use a blend of rep ranges.
Mostly 6–15 reps, with some 5s and 20–30s for variety.
Train close to failure, but not at failure on big lifts.
Leave 1–3 reps in reserve on compounds.
Save failure for machines, cables, and isolations.
Accumulate 8–20 sets per muscle per week.
Pick exercises you can perform well, consistently.
Progressively overload over time.
Bottom Line
Heavier weight isn’t better for muscle growth—it’s simply a tool.
You grow by applying enough tension, accumulating enough weekly volume, and training close enough to failure to challenge the muscle—no matter whether that’s 5 reps or 25.
If you’re hitting 5–30 reps, 8–20 weekly sets, and pushing intelligently—not recklessly—you’re following exactly what the evidence says builds muscle the fastest and safest.
If you want to start managing your health and training better, join The Forge or reach out to me directly at jackson@drjacksontaylor.com.
The Dear Brothers Podcast — Weekly conversations on strength, faith, and the pursuit of better manhood. Available on all major platforms.
Proud Ambassador for The Vintage Gentlemen — Makers of timeless gear for the modern man. From handcrafted leather goods to whiskey decanters, they embody craftsmanship and character.
Use code DRJACKSON20 for 20% off your order at thevintagegentlemen.com.
Follow Along — Instagram: @drjacksontaylor
Books & Courses — For more ebooks & courses, please join The Brotherhood.
References:
Fry, A.C. (2004). The role of resistance exercise intensity on muscle fibre adaptations. Sports Medicine, 34(10), 663–679.
Morton, R.W. et al. (2016). Neither load nor systemic hormones determine resistance training–mediated hypertrophy or strength gains in resistance-trained young men. Journal of Applied Physiology, 121(1), 129–138.
Schoenfeld, B.J. (2010). The mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and their application to resistance training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(10), 2857–2872.
Schoenfeld, B.J., Ogborn, D. & Krieger, J.W. (2017). Effects of low- vs. high-load resistance training on muscle hypertrophy in well-trained subjects. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 31(12), 3508–3513.
Schoenfeld, B.J., Grgic, J. (2019). Does training to failure maximize muscle hypertrophy? Strength and Conditioning Journal, 41(3), 108–113.
Schoenfeld, B.J. et al. (2019). Resistance training volume enhances muscle hypertrophy but not strength in trained men. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 51(1), 94–103.*
